More demonstrations which show that BSD is insecure

A presentation and showing various security faults in FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD which the developers chose to ignore. Also a full demonstration on how to crack OpenBSD thus busting the myth of it’s security.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to More demonstrations which show that BSD is insecure

  1. Helmers Heiners says:

    Compared with any of the zilion Linux Distros OpenBSD is unhackable. Believe it or not you “truth telling sucker”, get on and try hack OpenBSD or even any other BSD.

    • Chris says:

      I like how you are a Mirror of the Hubris of the BSD community 😉

    • serginho89 says:

      Don’t worry; no body listens to this idiot. This idiot’s life must suck really bad; I can’t help but feel sorry for him.

    • Paweł S says:

      You’ve got to be kidding me. BSD “security” mechanisms are jokes compared to Linux. They don’t even provide ASLR, not to mention SELinux, Apparmor and so on. Furthermore, issues are fixed on Linux instantly which cannot be said about bsd.

  2. Chris says:

    Here is an Idea for a new Blog Post:
    The sad Story of GnoBSD, or how OpenBSD got so scared of something new and fresh that they wet themself while Crying Rivers.

    Seriously, Research GnoBSD. It is an Interesting insight in what drives OpenBSD. Sadyl thou, the Project is dead (for obvious Reasons as you might find out, dear Blogger)

    • Chris says:

      Or do a ComixWall Bit. Also very interesting. OpenBSDs goal is to be a small thing so that they can keep their “security” Tight. Theo de Raadt is really afraid of OpenBSD becoming Popular.

  3. chris says:

    @serginho89

    Same Too you.

  4. Oci says:

    Pissing on each other kills all credibility on both sides. u_u

  5. At pornhub, we use FreeBSD for hosting.

    • Paweł S says:

      It’s not surprising, since it’s a whore OS, because of bsd license. Everyone can do what he want with such crap and bsd gets nothing back. Thus it makes it even worse than a whore.

  6. Paweł S says:

    There’s funny thing at lkml.org about scalability and bsd fanboism:

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/5/147

    It seems bsd developers and fanboys have no clue about Linux and bsd itself. 🙂

    • rpgb1100 says:

      Thanks for the heads up, we have a friend that’s running and assessing it right now. His report will be published in an up coming article.

  7. Helmers Heiners says:

    “You’ve got to be kidding me. BSD “security” mechanisms are jokes compared to Linux. They don’t even provide ASLR, not to mention SELinux, Apparmor and so on.”
    BSD doesn´t need such shit you moron. And security bugs are considered usual bugs with no importance by Linus himself, so don´t even talk about security and Linux

  8. Helmers Heiners says:

    “It just proves it’s the most secure OS in the world”…..
    How stupid must you be to tell something like this.
    What´s most popular: Windows.
    Is it the most secure OS? No.

Leave a reply to Chris Cancel reply